THE S+ Q&A SESSION: TOP TEN AUDIENCE QUESTIONS
answered by Allen, Emma, Lara, Logan, Scott and Sinead
Q1: What is the biggest learning curve that should be put into our legislation and influence law and culture in our society?
Logan: Adopting the attitude of ‘fuck capitalism’ that’s often found when people try to create something ‘other’ is not going to get the industry very far. I know we wanna be free and we wanna be accepted but the reality is that we’re not, so we have to find a way to work with the Police, to work with Government. As much as I want the law abolished, it’s not gonna happen in my lifetime. So I think it’s really important to acknowledge those differences, and just turn the other cheek and try and make it work as much as possible.
Q2: How do we feel about sex education in terms of sex-positive education?
Lara (above): I wish the education I received as a kid had included some degree of sex positivity. I think what’s really lacking is education around emotions. How do we process emotions? What are emotions? How do we address our grievances in each other when we have big feelings and all that kind of stuff? As for sex positivity in education, it’s just a really tricky issue right now. We need to tread really carefully when talking about children, not approach such issues by running at them. I’m sure some changes are in the pipeline but it’s gonna be a while yet.
Q3: How will your dispute resolution scheme work and how will you ensure it’s fair and ethical?
Lara: The S+ dispute resolution scheme is not there to decide who is right and who is wrong. We’re not policing anything or being a judge — we’re just facilitating because people struggle to resolve conflicts. If your event receives a complaint, you should first go through your own processes for handling it. If there’s still a grievance, the parties can refer it to the S+ team. We’ll ask: what have you done so far; what processes have you followed? And then we’ll make recommendations. We may have a bit more knowledge of conflict management processes. Sometimes it just takes a third party to have oversight of something — to look at it with fresh eyes, and get people to look at it again.
So what S+ provides access to is quite a chunky conflict management policy, giving a lot of information about ways to manage disputes, exchange information, and have a meeting. As well as the questions you need to ask yourself if you’re dealing with, say, a consent breach; and what not to do.
Q4: What are the plans around lobbying for clearer laws on licensing for venues? Very few venues will host play parties, for example. Many venues don’t know which licences they’re supposed to have, and we promoters don’t know which licences we’re supposed to be asking for.
Lara: There are common misconceptions around licensing laws. We don’t really need any changes in laws — we just need more understanding of how they apply, and how to navigate them. Getting laws changed is a very long process. It doesn’t happen easily and I don’t really think it’s needed for events at the moment. There’s no licence needed for adults to get together and have fun times. Only certain things are licensable, like providing alcoholic drinks or certain entertainment. And most venues will have a licence for that already, so you as an event don’t need to worry about having a licence. You just need to have carried out your risk assessments, and to be complying with all the regulatory laws that affect any event.
Q5: Do you think there’s been any change recently in local authorities’ attitude towards sex positive events?
Scott: I only talk to the police. We have a good relationship. I check with them weekly, for our events, that they do what they’re meant to do in terms of safeguarding the community, to make sure that they’re happy. So I think building your relationship is the most important thing. They’re not out to get you, just give them what they need and check in with them regularly.
Allen (above): During and coming out of lockdown, we did some sit-down perv parties called The Pearl Necklace. The Council came down to check on it, and were very supportive of us putting on an event, helping us to get some money through the door. The Council and the Police were looking forward to speaking to us after this event too. So I think positives are already happening, just by having today’s launch.
Q6: Is it seen as part of the Association’s role to interact with the media as well, and to consider what sort of strategy that requires?
Logan: Yes, our intention is to speak to the media, but I’ve been part of this world for about eight years now and every single time I get an email from the BBC or Channel 4 about doing a documentary or show, it comes out as this salacious treatment, so it immediately gets my back up. Just the other day, somebody at the BBC wanted to talk about pegging, and
immediately I was like, let’s vet it, let’s read it, let’s check their credentials. Historically we don’t have a great relationship with the media, who are there for an agenda. You need to know who you’re getting into bed with when you’re saying things. So I’d love to have that discussion, but I’d love it to be authentic and not just a certain narrative.
Q7: Isn’t saying there’s no requirement under the Licensing Act misleading and unhelpful? How do you come to that conclusion? Under the Act, you have to declare whether there’s any adult entertainment on the premises. And how do you relate to the Local Government Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1982? If you’re building a bridge between yourselves, regulators and police and local communities, you need to be able to answer those questions.
Lara: No one this evening is purporting to give legal advice. We’ve developed some industry guidance, and we’re guiding events to develop their own event management plans in such a way that they will comply with the relevant regulations. If people want legal advice then come and consult directly with us and we’ll provide tailored legal advice.
Sinead: In my opinion as an event organiser, the 2003 Licensing Act does not apply to our events, unless a council puts a clause into their licence, which they can do. Which is what happened in the E1 case.
Logan (above): There’s two separate conversations going on here. The questioner is talking about acts and entertainment and nudity. We’re not talking about entertainment and nudity and acts and so forth, because there is legislation about that. We’re talking about consenting adults in a space, which needs no licence. If there is one, show it to me afterwards and we can talk about it. But lets make sure we’re on the same page and everyone is clear.
Q8: I do welfare work, work across parties and encounter people who have been put on banned lists, which is something I have to deal with. With GDPR, we can’t exchange data between events. What are the possibilities of moving beyond this restriction?
Emma (above): Unfortunately you can’t change GDPR policy. There is a grey area — it will allow trade associations to give names to each other. But it’s such a grey area that it’s not really safe. So at the moment we are committing to this: each event keeps their banned list but don’t swap names as it puts your event at risk. In a perfect world we’d all swap names and say ‘these people are dangerous’, but we can’t, unfortunately.
Logan: But we shouldn’t step over the ethics of that. Just because I think someone’s unsafe because they did something doesn’t mean everyone thinks it. So we have to do this in a responsible way without impeding people’s self-expression. We have to have growth for people. Just because you fuck up now doesn’t mean that next year, when you go on a course or you get therapy, or you do whatever and you learn from it, we can just say ‘You’re banned forever’. What are we saying as a community?
Q9: Is any work being done on guidance on sexual health supplies for people attending these events, or work done by event organisers with local sexual health organisations?
Lara: We haven’t specifically got any guidance on that yet, so if you’d like to come and chat to us, we are really here for that. I know there is some uncertainty around provision of condoms. I’ve even experienced some events changing their policies over time. They’ve started off providing them then they’ve stopped because people say you can’t. There’s a little bit of confusion around that. So to develop an industry standard around what is needed — I would really welcome that.
Q10: I safeguard, manage and organise across several parties. Is there any tangible way S+ could help bring new venues or existing venues into the cohort and help them understand that they can get involved without risk and we can get more places to have our events?
Allen: That’s what we’re going to work on, so we can have some standards and get some clarification with what licensing is, what we can get away with. TG had issues in the past because we have a lot of performances and that is what is on the line with the sex entertainment licence. We know we can’t put on ‘sexual entertainment’, so our entertainment is not sexually entertaining, which is bad for a fetish club! But it would be great just to get the Police and Councils to tell us: this is what the law is, this is what we’re doing, this is what we want you to do. Then we can give that to clubs and venues and say: this is what we’ve been told by them.
Emma: Essentially it’d be an equivalent of the blue tick — a real-life blue tick for venues. You go there and say, ‘Hey I’m part of this thing’, and they say, ‘Oh yeah, I’ve heard about that’.
splusassociation.org.uk
FOX DEN FORUM FOR SEX-POSITIVE COMMUNITY: SEP 8
If you’ve been inspired by this article to find out more about the sex-positive community, have we got an event for you!
In London on Sunday September 8,
S+ Association launch-night emcee and speaker Sinead Mac Manus is hosting Fox Den Forum, a unique one-day pop-up conference for the sex-positive community, at Clapton’s MKII venue.
It will feature renowned sexologists, coaches, sex workers, educators and industry professionals for an afternoon of talks, chats, panel discussions, taster workshops and practical demonstrations on sex-positive topics.
The programme from 2pm to 7pm will dive into diverse topics from BDSM to sexual pleasure and authentic relating. The aim is to expand knowledge, foster connections, and promote personal growth in a welcoming and fun environment.
Speakers and workshop facilitators confirmed at publication time are:
Sasha Damjanovski — Curious Master, Intimacy Coach
Sarah Butcher — Sub in the City, BDSM Coach & Kink Educator
Binta Patel — Mindset & Emotions Coach
Felina Onyx — Burlesque Performer & Teacher
Haneen Khan — Sex and Communication Coach
Mistress Jayne — Pro Domme, Sex, Kink & Relationships Coach
Chris Hardy — Embodiment Coach & Men’s Work
Inna Goncharenko — Secret Sauce Angel, Sexologist
More names are due to be added, and alongside the curated programme there will be space for ‘Unconference’ offerings where attendees can propose a session and deliver it on the way. There will also be a small marketplace.
As well as learning and expanding your sexual and relating toolbox, there will be opportunities to connect to other sex-positive people through facilitated networking, connection activities and an after-conference party 7pm to 9pm.
Cost per person is £48 + £1 booking fee + £9.80 VAT, but a few free spaces may be available in return for a three-hour volunteer shift helping with setting-up, breaking-down, door, room management etc. Email The Fox Den here if interested.
Fox Den Forum takes place at MKII, 71-75 Powerscroft Road, London E5 0PT. Nearest station: Hackney Central Overground.
Tags: Business Matters, Community, Legal, Sex-Positive Events