Obsession: lots of sex and deceit, but not much to say about BDSM
Pre-publicity for new Netflix miniseries Obsession milked its alleged BDSM content to the max. But in reality this four-part drama (based on Josephine Hart’s 1991 novel Damage) is severely hogtied by the platform’s restrictions on portraying kink. And packing the story with so much basically vanilla sex as to leave virtually no room for exploration of psychology or character is a sad waste of talented actors. Banner, l-r: Richard Armitage (William), Charlie Murphy (Anna) and Rish Shah (Jay) in Obsession (image: Netflix)
OBSESSION
(Four-part Netflix miniseries)
Starring: Richard Armitage, Charlie Murphy, Indira Varma, Rish Shah
Directed by: Glenn Leyburn, Lisa
Barros D’Sa
Screenplay: Morgan Lloyd Malcolm,
Benji Walters
Reviewed by Tony Mitchell
Back in 1991, the author Josephine Hart published Damage, a critically acclaimed morality tale about an obsessive and ultimately destructive love affair.
In 1992, French director Louis Malle (by then working in Hollywood) turned Damage into a film starring Jeremy Irons, Juliette Binoche, Miranda Richardson and Rupert Graves.
With screenplay by David Hare, the Malle movie told the story of a physician-turned-politician (Irons) who betrays both his wife (Richardson) and son (Graves) by embarking on a reckless and compulsive secret affair with his son’s girlfriend (Binoche).
Obsession, which dropped on Netflix on April 13, has returned to the original literary source material for a new miniseries take on the story. Pre-publicity suggested it would be making rather more of the BDSM element of the novel, avoided by Malle in his earlier adaptation.
Unfortunately though, despite the presence of some great acting talent including Richard Armitage (The Hobbit trilogy), Charlie Murphy (Happy Valley, Halo, Peaky Blinders) and Indira Varma (Kama Sutra, Rome, Game of Thrones), Obsession seems aimed at engaging the same kind of people who perceived Fifty Shades of Grey as a state-of-the-art kink portrayal.
One way Obsession presents itself as a fresh take on Damage’s plot is by tweaking the dom/sub emphasis in the characters of the cheating couple.
William (Armitage), a surgeon with political ambitions, is now less the dominant alpha male and more the compliant collaborator, lustily accepting the role of dom to get his end away with (as it turns out) his son’s girlfriend Anna. At every encounter, it is Anna who tops William from the bottom, controlling exactly how he ‘dominates’ her.
Obsession screenwriter Morgan Lloyd Malcolm has explained that it was really important to her “not to be saying anything like BDSM sex is bad sex”.
At the same time, however, the programme-makers’ alleged desire to restore the BDSM dynamic absent from Malle’s film seems to have been substantially frustrated by what Netflix would permit to be seen on screen.
The result is that while Obsession features plenty of vigorous, naked shagging (enough to require an intimacy co-ordinator), evidence of the couple’s shared interest in sub/dom (and the accoutrements that typically accompany it) is so scant, the production certainly wouldn’t have needed a BDSM co-ordinator (if such even existed).
To be fair, with just four episodes that together add up to only about the same total screen time as the average superhero blockbuster (but with a lot less latex), Obsession is unable to benefit from the longform storytelling opportunities available to grander streaming projects.
Allotted the timespan of a full-size Netflix series, it might, for example, have explored in much greater depth the whole idea of topping from the bottom — a potentially fascinating subject, surely, even if you’re not into BDSM. And who knows, it might even have featured characters fleshed out beyond the paper-thinness Obsession affords them.
As it is, the main function of the other characters in this story is merely to provide the assorted backs behind which William and Anna do the dirty. So basically are these other figures sketched in, I almost missed that William’s wife Ingrid (Varma) is supposed to be a top barrister. Her job description might as well have been picked out of a hat for all it adds to the mix.
Obsession actually opens in a hospital operating theatre, where ‘brilliant surgeon’ William — for some reason you never get a mediocre surgeon in these stories do you? — is just completing the separation of newly-born conjoined twins. What a hero!
However, at Obsession’s compressed narrative pace, it’s not too long before the first hint comes that this apparent paragon of virtue may have other family-splitting talents too. It comes when he attends a political drinks party at which Anna — her identity as his son’s girlfriend not yet revealed — is also present.
Their eyes meet across a crowded cliché and there is instant mutual lust. The first fuck soon follows, and thereafter the action is largely focused on plotting the shortest distance between the duo and their next illicit shag without giving the game away to William’s wife, son Jay (Rish Shah) or daughter Sally (Sonera Angel).
Thanks no doubt to the intimacy co-ordinator, the perfidious pair’s numerous ensuing naked encounters are presented with nudity so tastetful, they might have been recreating famous publicity poses from a coffee-table book of 50 years of soft porn movie posters.
To me, scenes involving light wrist bondage, blindfolding and, er, sensual feeding all evoked half-remembered images from such vintage ‘mainstream’ ventures into S&M territory as 1975’s Story of O or 1986’s 9½ Weeks. Unsurprisingly, by today’s standards, such imagery seems a trifle hackneyed.
Hilarity, meanwhile, definitely isn’t a part of Obsession’s offer — except unintentionally. For this, I refer you to the drama’s most violent sex scene, which takes place between William and a non-consenting hotel bed.
Entering the hotel room his son and his fiancée (William’s lover) have just left, and gripped by passion/jealousy/whatever, our hero sets about rogering the bed they were recently sleeping in. He shags the sheets and pokes the pillows. Please show some respect and refrain from tittering at this very serious scene.
Anyone who has read even the shortest online synopsis of Obsession will have been primed for some unspecified devastating consequences to occur at some point — which they do. The terrible event that changes everything is, of course, held back for as long as possible in the narrative arc. But when it happens, it does actually change the tone of this drama for the better.
Suddenly Obsession is no longer merely voyeur to the playing-out of a high stakes illicit affair. Suddenly the story and the characters in it are brought down to earth with a splattering thud, and everything becomes rather more real and authentic as everyone has to deal with the aftermath.
The final chapter of the drama also presents information about Anna’s history that provides a probable explanation for why she’s the obsessive femme fatale that she is.
Perhaps like me, you might feel more time should have been devoted to unpicking this revelation, and perhaps earlier in the story too. But that is not the way with Obsession, which casually tosses in this crucial bit of back story almost as an afterthought. Don’t blink or you might miss it.
Incidentally no equivalent explanation is offered for Williams’s disgraceful betrayal of his wife and children. Presumably he’s like that because, well, he’s just a bloke, innit. And a feminist too, allegedly. I mean, what more do you want? Nobody’s perfect.
So: did Obsession’s makers achieve their objective of not portraying BDSM sex as bad sex? My answer is yes, they did — but only by largely failing to portray BDSM sex at all.
I can’t imagine anyone who does stick with Obsession to the (literally) bitter end coming away blaming BDSM per se for the dark turn that events take towards the finale. It’s clearly the two lead characters’ obsessiveness itself that seals everyone’s fates — rather than the particular type of sex they’re allegedly obsessed by. TM
Tags: BDSM-Lite, Netflix, Streaming Releases